JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 21, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Januario Cano Arenas

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó inaplicar el Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000 por ser manifiestamente contrario a las disposiciones constitucionales.

En consecuencia, se dirimió el conflicto de competencias suscitado entre el Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca y el Juzgado Quinto Civil Municipal de Bogotá, en cuanto a la acción de tutela incoada por el ciudadano de la referencia contra la Fiscalía General de la Nación y otros, en el sentido de que la competencia para conocer de ella corresponderá al mencionado Tribunal, al cual se remitió el expediente respectivo.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. INAPLICAR el articulo 1 del Decreto 1382 de 2000 por ser manifiestamente contrario a las disposiciones constitucionales.
  2. Segundo. DIRIMIR el conflicto de competencias suscitado entre el Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca y el Juzgado
  3. Quinto. Civil Municipal de Bogota, en cuanto a la accion de tutela incoada por Januario Cano Arenas contra la Fiscalia General de la Nacion y otros, en el sentido de que la competencia para conocer de ella correspondera al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, al cual se remitira el expediente respectivo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.